Jesus warned us.
Will we listen?

Categories

–Evolution needs creation to exist

April 28, 2016

The notion of evolution requires ‘creation.’ Creation of half-baked ideas, all of which ignore today’s science. To believe that mankind evolved also requires us to ignore all life surrounding us. Must we argue about man’s evolution any longer? No. Just look around at world in which we live. There are three main reasons evolution can not explain where we came from.

Reason number 1

Mankind has no constructive purpose for being here.

Our lifetime, singly or as an entire species, contributes nothing useful to the successful operation of this planet or to our environment. We’re not an integral part of the chain of life that surrounds us. Earth doesn’t need us to spin it, animals don’t need us to teach them how to survive, plants don’t need us to cultivate or water them. If we evolved along with everything else that shares this planet, we’d have a useful part to play in the chain of life like grass and trees, lions and gazelle, whales and fish, insects and bacteria.

As it is, we need them. They don’t need us.

If we evolved, other life forms on Earth would rely on us in some mutually beneficial way and we’d have our slot, our purpose, our membership here in club Earth. But no. We’re not integrated. Earth and its abundant forms of life do not need us at all. In fact, they’d be better off without us and our ability to damage the environment and obliterate another species with every chance we get.

Our being here at all should fill you with a disturbing sense of wonder.

Reason number 2

We’re always changing how we do things.

For as long as anyone knows, plants and animals have always done things the same way. Birds build the same kind of nests, beavers build the same kind of dams, bees the same kind of honeycomb. They have a method that works and it doesn’t change.

But not us. Even though we share the same air and water as birds, beavers and bees, we change and do things differently today than we did yesterday. We burned wood for warmth, later coal and now gas, which is flow controlled by electrical circuits powered by nuclear reactions. This is just one example of thousands of ways we’ve changed how we do things––taking its place among countless methods changed by ancestors so dissatisfied with their life of position, power and economics that they plotted and killed in excess of what was needed––and considered it justified. It continues this way.

Why don’t we do things the same way as generations before us, like birds and bees and bears and beavers? Why aren’t we settled on our methods of doing things like all the plants and animals around us, flowing along with our environment as an extension of our natural surroundings––instead of trying to change it, change ourselves, and change those around us?

Because we’re not on the same frequency.

Reason number 3

We have no genetic knowledge.

A robin doesn’t need another robin to teach it how to build a nest, they just know. If they and other life forms evolved with that kind of inborn genetic knowledge that gets passed along, why didn’t mankind? If we’re so highly evolved, why are we completely ignorant at birth, having to learn everything from scratch––from using our first spoon to burying our dead?

With our superior brains and vast intellect, shouldn’t we be far ahead of the lowly animals, each child born knowing at least something from a previous generation? Some inherited constructive point of reference that evolved in our brains to help us survive?

But no. Infants are helpless for years and years. Our species operates so differently from everything else living here on Earth, it boggles the mind.

Reason number 4?

We’re unhooked from our beginnings. (Evolutionists have trouble with this.)

Evolutionists preach that all life came from the same pond scum, and that we remain hooked to that beginning, that source. But mankind suddenly bursts forth and does everything differently than the cradle of life around us. Crusaders of evolution then “create” new religious paragraphs about a “missing link” to maintain their belief system devoid of science and even history. As is, Saint Darwin teaches more ‘creation’ in his church of evolution than his congregation realizes.

Here’s a quote from the original “Creation” Bible, Genesis Chapter 1, verse 26: Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”  

We were put here. We were made. A premeditated engineering decision. One that would make mankind very distinct from other life forms on this planet.

You may think the Bible is hocus-pocus and requires blind belief, however, there are more indications of DNA replication science in the Bible than have ever been a part of Darwinian religion. Charles Darwin, the spoiled rich kid and whimsical thinker from 1859, offers only outdated fairytales in the face of today’s actual genetic research.

There used to be a theory that the sun traveled around earth. Wrong. There used to be a theory that if you could’t see germs, they didn’t exist. Wrong. Some very smart surgeons thought that washing germs off their hands was hocus-pocus well into the 1930’s. It just goes to show that being smart about some things, does not mean you understand every thing. Our misguided loyalty to falsehoods, nurtured by pride, is another difference between us and other life.

Seems to me that the Bible of creation had it right all along.